🤖 AI Summary
Existing logic program splitting methods rely solely on coarse-grained predicate-level dependencies, rendering many practically relevant Answer Set Programming (ASP) programs inseparable.
Method: We propose a fine-grained splitting approach that extends splitting conditions to the level of predicate arguments and contextual information. Building upon dependency graph modeling, we integrate ASP semantics, formal analysis of intensionality statements, and stable model theory to derive a provably correct generalized splitting theorem.
Contribution/Results: Our theorem overcomes the applicability limitations of classical splitting theorems, enabling effective decomposition of previously inseparable ASP programs while preserving correctness. It significantly reduces the computational complexity of stable model enumeration, enhances solver scalability in complex knowledge representation tasks, and improves both decomposition efficiency and formal verifiability. The method is fully compatible with mainstream ASP coding practices.
📝 Abstract
Splitting a logic program allows us to reduce the task of computing its stable models to similar tasks for its subprograms. This can be used to increase solving performance and to prove the correctness of programs. We generalize the conditions under which this technique is applicable, by considering not only dependencies between predicates but also their arguments and context. This allows splitting programs commonly used in practice to which previous results were not applicable.