PolicyGuide: From Guarding One Action to Guiding the Whole Workflow for Policy-Compliant LLM Agents

📅 2026-08-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出PolicyGuide方法,通过将策略编译为工作流图并使用主动验证器来指导客服LLM代理遵循多步骤程序,从而提高策略合规性。
📝 Abstract
Customer-service LLM agents must follow organizational policy when acting on a user's behalf. Compliance failures arise from either forbidden actions, such as granting an ineligible change, or omitted procedural requirements, such as identification or confirmation. Runtime safeguards can intervene on risky actions, but action-local checks do not guide an agent through a multi-step procedure. Workflow-following systems support prescribed process execution, but primarily target workflow completion rather than safeguarding agent behavior. PolicyGuide instead compiles each domain policy into a workflow graph and invokes a proactive verifier at user-turn boundaries. From persisted graph state, the verifier reconciles open requests and returns step-specific remediation along a policy-compliant path. Across the $τ^2$-bench airline, retail, and telecom domains with a GPT-5.4 agent and verifier, PolicyGuide raises mean $\mathrm{Pass}^4$ from $0.42$ to $0.62$, with the largest gain on telecom ($0.19$ to $0.61$), the most workflow-structured domain. The same workflows transfer to Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro agents. Complementary evaluations find the lowest observed attack-success rate under adversarial users and the strongest procedural compliance in an author-designed workflow-level validation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLM Agents
Policy Compliance
Workflow Execution
Runtime Safeguards
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

workflow graph
proactive verifier
policy compliance
multi-step procedure