Auditable CT Phenotyping Through Report-derived Radiological Observations

📅 2026-08-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究使用基于报告的放射学观察构建的可审计CT表型(ACT)方法,解决了医学图像基础模型在预测临床表型时依赖疾病特异性发现还是捷径的问题。
📝 Abstract
Medical image foundation models can predict clinical phenotypes from computed tomography (CT), but strong performance leaves open whether they read disease-specific findings or shortcuts that correlate with the diagnosis. We tested this in 221 electronic-health-record (EHR) phenotypes using Auditable CT phenotyping (ACT), built on report-derived radiological observations. We trained ACT on 38,317 patients, mined 376,194 observations and evaluated it in 25,183 held-out patients. ACT exceeded five vision-language baselines on zero-shot annotation, and CT-CLIP across 221 phenotypes from unseen CT pulmonary angiography, both under zero-shot scoring (0.651 versus 0.572) and under linear probing (0.709 versus 0.662). Reading each probe exposes what accuracy conceals: only 97 observations occupy the 221 rank-1 positions, and one phrase describing aortic and coronary calcification ranks first for 20 phenotypes, including osteoporosis, urinary tract infection and major depressive disorder. Restricting the bank to clinician-specified evidence redirects those probes onto phenotype-related observations in 86 phenotypes at no accuracy cost (0.751 versus 0.741). Accurate CT-based EHR phenotyping can therefore rest on observations that are not valid evidence for the coded phenotype and that ACT can identify and intervene on.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Computed Tomography
Clinical Phenotypes
Radiological Observations
Auditable CT phenotyping
Electronic Health Record
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Auditable CT phenotyping (ACT)
report-derived radiological observations
zero-shot annotation
linear probing
clinician-specified evidence
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
R
Riga Wu
Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Walter Witschey
Walter Witschey
Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yicheng Li
Yicheng Li
Zhejiang University
computer science
F
Felix Barajas Ordonez
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
K
Keno K. Bressem
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
L
Lisa C. Adams
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gary E. Weissman
Gary E. Weissman
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
MedicineCritical careclinical informaticsnatural language processingsocial networks
Li Shen
Li Shen
Professor of Informatics and Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
medical image computingbioinformaticsmachine learningbrain imaging genomicsAlzheimer's disease
C
Christos Davatzikos
Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (AIBIL), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
E
Eduardo Barbosa
Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel Truhn
Daniel Truhn
Professor of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMedical Imaging
Tianyu Han
Tianyu Han
University of Pennsylvania
Medical image analysismachine learning