LEAP: Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for LLM-based Probabilistic Forecasting

📅 2026-09-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出LEAP方法,通过单独评估每项证据并结合先验分布生成预测结果,以解决传统单块预测中证据影响不透明和不确定性问题。
📝 Abstract
LLM-based forecasting systems have improved on real-world tasks such as financial markets and sports outcomes, largely through stronger search and tool use. Many systems still ask an LLM to read all collected evidence together and produce the final forecast. We call this design Monolithic Prediction. It can obscure how individual evidence items affect the result and collapse uncertainty across competing outcomes. We propose LEAP (Likelihood Elicitation and Aggregation for Probabilistic forecasting), which reorganizes how collected evidence is used in the prediction stage. LEAP examines each evidence item separately and elicits likelihood parameters that describe its implications for the target. An explicit prior and a deterministic probabilistic model then combine these likelihoods into a posterior distribution. This procedure supports continuous, single-choice, and multi-choice forecasts while preserving reproducible evidence contributions. We build a benchmark covering forecasting, information-seeking, and browsing tasks, and evaluate LEAP on our own agent loop and several agent CLI frameworks. Given the same evidence, LEAP improves most prediction and calibration metrics across models and remains stronger under controlled comparisons of prior access, inference budget, and aggregation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Monolithic Prediction
LLM-based forecasting
uncertainty
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Likelihood Elicitation
Probabilistic Forecasting
Evidence Aggregation
Posterior Distribution