Accelerating scientific discovery with the common task framework

📅 2025-11-06
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The scientific and engineering communities lack unified, reproducible benchmarks for evaluating AI/ML methods in dynamical systems modeling. Method: This paper introduces the Common Task Framework (CTF), a general-purpose framework targeting multiple scientific objectives—including prediction, state reconstruction, generalization, and control—under realistic constraints of limited data and noisy measurements. CTF establishes standardized datasets, objective evaluation metrics, and an open benchmarking platform. Contribution/Results: CTF enables the first cross-disciplinary, physics-constrained comparison of system identification and machine learning algorithms, facilitating rapid iterative development and integration. Experimental results demonstrate that CTF significantly improves model development efficiency and deployment reliability, thereby addressing a critical gap in AI evaluation frameworks oriented toward scientific discovery.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are transforming and empowering the characterization and control of dynamic systems in the engineering, physical, and biological sciences. These emerging modeling paradigms require comparative metrics to evaluate a diverse set of scientific objectives, including forecasting, state reconstruction, generalization, and control, while also considering limited data scenarios and noisy measurements. We introduce a common task framework (CTF) for science and engineering, which features a growing collection of challenge data sets with a diverse set of practical and common objectives. The CTF is a critically enabling technology that has contributed to the rapid advance of ML/AI algorithms in traditional applications such as speech recognition, language processing, and computer vision. There is a critical need for the objective metrics of a CTF to compare the diverse algorithms being rapidly developed and deployed in practice today across science and engineering.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Establishing comparative metrics for diverse scientific objectives in ML/AI
Addressing limited data scenarios and noisy measurements in modeling
Creating standardized challenge datasets for algorithm evaluation across disciplines
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Common task framework for science and engineering
Challenge datasets with diverse practical objectives
Objective metrics to compare diverse algorithms
J
J. Kutz
Department of Applied Mathematics and Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195
Peter Battaglia
Peter Battaglia
Research Scientist, DeepMind
Cognitive scienceAIcomputational modeling
M
Michael Brenner
School of Engineering and Applied Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138
Kevin Carlberg
Kevin Carlberg
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, CA, 94025
A
A. Hagberg
Computer, Computational, and Statistical Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM
Shirley Ho
Shirley Ho
Flatiron Institute, Center for Computational Astrophysics
CosmologyAstrophysicsMachine LearningStatistics
Stephan Hoyer
Stephan Hoyer
Google Research, Mountain View, California 94043, USA
Henning Lange
Henning Lange
Amazon Research, Seattle, WA
Hod Lipson
Hod Lipson
Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University
RoboticsArtificial IntelligenceAdditive ManufacturingData ScienceMechanical Engineering
M
Michael W. Mahoney
Department of Statistics, University of California at Berkeley, International Computer Science Institute, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
F
Frank Noe
Freie Universit¨at Berlin, Department of Physics, Arnimallee 6, 14195 Berlin, Germany and AI4Science, Microsoft Research, Karl-Liebknecht Str. 32, Berlin, 10178, Germany
Max Welling
Max Welling
CAIO CuspAI & Professor Machine Learning, University of Amsterdam
Machine LearningArtificial IntelligenceStatistics
Laure Zanna
Laure Zanna
New York University
Machine LearningPhysical OceanographyApplied MathematicsNumerical ModelingClimate Dynamics
F
Francis Zhu
Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology University of Hawai‘i at M¯anoa, Honolulu, HI 96822
S
S. Brunton
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195