MedSNIP: Building and Benchmarking Snippet-Level Granularity for Medical Fact Verification

📅 2026-09-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文提出MedSNIP,通过片段级验证方法解决医学事实验证中临床结构依赖性问题,引入了MedSNIP-Bench基准和自动片段生成流程。
📝 Abstract
A medical claim's correctness often depends not on the claim alone, but on the clinical structure around it. A claim may require a lab reference range, a causal or conditional link, or patient-specific details to be judged correctly, and atom-level decomposition can fragment these dependencies, leaving the verifier with clinically incomplete claims. We reformulate medical fact-checking around snippet-level verification, where clause-grouped units preserve local clinical structure. We introduce MedSNIP-Bench, a human-annotated benchmark for snippet-level medical fact verification, and MedSNIP, an automatic snippet-generation pipeline. MedSNIP-Bench covers 276 consumer-health and clinical-vignette responses, segmented into 2,524 snippets with dual in-general and in-patient-context labels and six structural pattern codes. MedSNIP is evaluated against human snippet boundaries on MedSNIP-Bench and then used to generate snippet-level units for external corpora. Across MedSNIP-Bench, HealthFC, and MedHallu, snippet-level verification preserves or improves false-class F1, with gains concentrated where answers are long enough to fragment and where the verifier is strong enough to exploit the recovered structure. The largest merge-pattern gain is on causal-conditional clinical chains. It also reduces verifier calls by 24-73%, though the saving survives end-to-end only when decomposition is cheap, which an open-weight decomposer makes possible at no loss of chunking fidelity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

medical fact verification
clinical structure
snippet-level
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

snippet-level verification
MedSNIP-Bench
clinical structure preservation