🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses practical challenges in fostering AI literacy among children aged 7–13 within family contexts: parents must simultaneously support children’s autonomous learning and compensate for their own gaps in AI knowledge, while navigating cognitive blind spots related to privacy protection and technology integration. Using focus group interviews and the Self-Directed Learning (SDL) framework, we analyzed qualitative data from 32 parent–child dyads to develop a “family co-learning”–oriented AI literacy model. Findings reveal a structural tension between parental oversight and children’s autonomy. We propose, for the first time, a family-centered AI literacy support framework that integrates cognitive scaffolding with critical reflection, underscoring the necessity of cultivating risk awareness beyond formal educational settings and designing tool-based support mechanisms. This work provides empirical grounding and novel theoretical insights for AI education interventions targeting children and the development of family-oriented educational technologies.
📝 Abstract
As generative AI becomes embedded in children's learning spaces, families face new challenges in guiding its use. Middle childhood (ages 7-13) is a critical stage where children seek autonomy even as parental influence remains strong. Using self-directed learning (SDL) as a lens, we examine how parents perceive and support children's developing AI literacy through focus groups with 13 parent-child pairs. Parents described evolving phases of engagement driven by screen time, self-motivation, and growing knowledge. While many framed AI primarily as a study tool, few considered its non-educational roles or risks, such as privacy and infrastructural embedding. Parents also noted gaps in their own AI understanding, often turning to joint exploration and engagement as a form of co-learning. Our findings reveal how families co-construct children's AI literacy, exposing tensions between practical expectations and critical literacies, and provide design implications that foster SDL while balancing autonomy and oversight.