🤖 AI Summary
Grassroots courts face severe case backlogs due to chronic understaffing and heavy reliance on manual, experience-based adjudication. Method: This paper proposes a novel legal article recommendation paradigm integrating knowledge graphs with large language models (LLMs). We introduce the Case-Enhanced Legal Article Knowledge Graph (CLAKG), which unifies statutory provisions, judicial precedents, and multi-dimensional semantic relations; further, we design an LLM-driven automated graph construction and closed-loop reasoning recommendation framework, incorporating prompt engineering, supervised fine-tuning, and precedent–statute semantic matching. Results: Evaluated on criminal judgment data from China Judgments Online, our approach improves legal article recommendation accuracy from 0.549 to 0.694—significantly outperforming existing baselines. To our knowledge, this is the first work to tightly integrate case-enhanced knowledge graphs with LLM-based closed-loop reasoning, offering a practical, deployable solution for enhancing judicial efficiency in resource-constrained, low-AI-assistance environments.
📝 Abstract
Court efficiency is vital for social stability. However, in most countries around the world, the grassroots courts face case backlogs, with decisions relying heavily on judicial personnel's cognitive labor, lacking intelligent tools to improve efficiency. To address this issue, we propose an efficient law article recommendation approach utilizing a Knowledge Graph (KG) and a Large Language Model (LLM). Firstly, we propose a Case-Enhanced Law Article Knowledge Graph (CLAKG) as a database to store current law statutes, historical case information, and correspondence between law articles and historical cases. Additionally, we introduce an automated CLAKG construction method based on LLM. On this basis, we propose a closed-loop law article recommendation method. Finally, through a series of experiments using judgment documents from the website"China Judgements Online", we have improved the accuracy of law article recommendation in cases from 0.549 to 0.694, demonstrating that our proposed method significantly outperforms baseline approaches.