DTKG: Dual-Track Knowledge Graph-Verified Reasoning Framework for Multi-Hop QA

πŸ“… 2025-10-17
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing multi-hop question answering methods face a trade-off between parallel fact verification and sequential chain-of-thought reasoning: LLM-based verification excels at parallel processing but struggles to model structured reasoning chains, while KG path retrieval supports chain reasoning yet often introduces redundant paths. Method: We propose DTKG, a dual-track knowledge graph verification and reasoning framework that, for the first time, incorporates cognitive science’s dual-process theory into multi-hop reasoning. DTKG employs a reasoning-pattern classifier to dynamically identify whether a query requires parallel or sequential reasoning, then routes it to either LLM-based semantic verification or KG-based structured path retrieval accordingly. Contribution/Results: This design synergistically combines complementary strengths, substantially reducing redundant retrievals while improving both reasoning efficiency and accuracy. On mainstream multi-hop QA benchmarks, DTKG achieves an average 5.2% absolute accuracy gain over strong baselines and reduces inference latency by 37%, demonstrating robust adaptability and generalizability across heterogeneous reasoning tasks.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Multi-hop reasoning for question answering (QA) plays a critical role in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for modern large language models (LLMs). The accurate answer can be obtained through retrieving relational structure of entities from knowledge graph (KG). Regarding the inherent relation-dependency and reasoning pattern, multi-hop reasoning can be in general classified into two categories: i) parallel fact-verification multi-hop reasoning question, i.e., requiring simultaneous verifications of multiple independent sub-questions; and ii) chained multi-hop reasoning questions, i.e., demanding sequential multi-step inference with intermediate conclusions serving as essential premises for subsequent reasoning. Currently, the multi-hop reasoning approaches singly employ one of two techniques: LLM response-based fact verification and KG path-based chain construction. Nevertheless, the former excels at parallel fact-verification but underperforms on chained reasoning tasks, while the latter demonstrates proficiency in chained multi-hop reasoning but suffers from redundant path retrieval when handling parallel fact-verification reasoning. These limitations deteriorate the efficiency and accuracy for multi-hop QA tasks. To address this challenge, we propose a novel dual-track KG verification and reasoning framework DTKG, which is inspired by the Dual Process Theory in cognitive science. Specifically, DTKG comprises two main stages: the Classification Stage and the Branch Processing Stage.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses limitations in multi-hop QA reasoning efficiency and accuracy
Resolves underperformance in parallel versus chained reasoning approaches
Improves knowledge graph verification for complex question answering tasks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Dual-track KG verification framework for multi-hop QA
Combines LLM fact verification with KG path construction
Classifies reasoning types for parallel and chained questions
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.