Institution profile

University of Massachusetts Lowell

Academic institutionnorthamerica · us
Official website
Research library96linked papers
Opportunities0open roles
Selected work

Representative Papers

FairFlow: Mitigating Dataset Biases through Undecided Learning for Natural Language Understanding

Mar 22, 2025Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Language models are vulnerable to dataset biases—such as shortcut learning and spurious correlations—leading to degraded cross-domain generalization and compromised fairness. To address this, we propose *Undecided Learning*, a novel paradigm that actively rejects high-confidence yet potentially biased predictions via an uncertainty-driven prediction suppression mechanism. Methodologically, we design a bias-aware multi-view generative and contrastive learning framework, integrating both data- and model-level perturbations to jointly model and suppress both known and unknown biases in a unified manner. Empirically, our approach significantly outperforms existing debiasing methods on cross-domain transfer and challenging sample benchmarks, while preserving source-domain performance. Notably, it achieves the first demonstrated robust mitigation of *unknown* biases—without requiring prior knowledge or bias annotations—thereby offering a principled pathway toward improved model generalization and fairness.

1 citationsRead paper

Exploring Interdisciplinary Team Collaboration in Clinical NLP Projects Through the Lens of Activity Theory

Sep 30, 2024arXiv.org

Interdisciplinary collaboration between clinicians and AI researchers—particularly speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and natural language processing (NLP) scientists—is frequently undermined by blurred disciplinary boundaries, fragmented terminologies, and divergent interpretations of clinical data; existing literature lacks systematic analysis of underlying mechanisms and actionable mitigation strategies. Method: This study pioneers the application of activity theory to examine SLP–NLP collaboration, employing semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis across multiple clinical NLP projects. Contribution/Results: We identify three core barriers: (1) professional discourse conflict, (2) data interpretation tension, and (3) absence of effective knowledge mediation. We empirically validate clinical data’s dual role as a “boundary object”—facilitating yet also complicating cross-domain coordination. Building on this, we propose the novel paradigm of “AI as knowledge mediator” and design an AI-driven knowledge-brokering framework, offering a transferable, theory-grounded collaboration model and practical guidelines for clinical NLP initiatives.

1 citationsRead paper
Recent publications

Latest Papers