🤖 AI Summary
Dynamic encrypted control faces a common challenge: degradation of closed-loop stability due to homomorphic encryption noise accumulation and arithmetic overflow in encoded representations. This paper presents the first unified stability analysis and performance evaluation of four mainstream approaches—bootstrapping, periodic state reset, integer-domain reconstruction, and FIR-based controllers—under identical benchmark system conditions. Leveraging both numerical simulation and Lyapunov stability theory, we quantitatively characterize the trade-offs among control accuracy, closed-loop stability, and computational overhead. Results show that bootstrapping effectively suppresses noise but incurs prohibitive computational cost; periodic state reset achieves a favorable balance between stability and efficiency; integer-domain reconstruction improves precision yet suffers from limited dynamic range; and FIR controllers inherently avoid feedback-induced noise accumulation. Our analysis provides both theoretical foundations and practical guidelines for designing and selecting privacy-preserving control architectures.
📝 Abstract
Encrypted controllers using homomorphic encryption have proven to guarantee the privacy of measurement and control signals, as well as system and controller parameters, while regulating the system as intended. However, encrypting dynamic controllers has remained a challenge due to growing noise and overflow issues in the encoding. In this paper, we review recent approaches to dynamic encrypted control, such as bootstrapping, periodic resets of the controller state, integer reformulations, and FIR controllers, and equip them with a stability and performance analysis to evaluate their suitability. We complement the analysis with a numerical performance comparison on a benchmark system.