CUTEv2: Unified and Configurable Matrix Extension for Diverse CPU Architectures with Minimal Design Overhead

📅 2026-04-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenges of existing CPU matrix extensions, which struggle to efficiently adapt across diverse architectures due to high hardware/software overhead, tight coupling with the processor pipeline, and fine-grained synchronization requirements. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose a unified and configurable CPU matrix extension architecture that decouples the matrix unit from the pipeline, enabling asynchronous execution, flexible-granularity matrix-multiply abstractions, and mixed-precision computation. This design achieves low-overhead integration while maintaining synergy with existing compute and memory resources. Evaluated on four open-source CPU platforms, the approach attains over 90% GEMM utilization. It outperforms Intel AMX by 1.57× on ResNet, 1.57× on BERT, and 2.31× on Llama3. A 4 TOPS@2GHz matrix unit implemented in 14nm technology occupies only 0.53 mm².

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Matrix extensions have emerged as an essential feature in modern CPUs to address the surging demands of AI workloads. However, existing designs often incur substantial hardware and software design overhead. Tight coupling with the CPU pipeline complicates integration across diverse CPUs, while fine-grained synchronous instructions hinder the development of high-performance kernels. This paper proposes a unified and configurable CPU matrix extension architecture. By decoupling matrix units from the CPU pipeline, the design enables low-overhead integration while maintaining close coordination with existing compute and memory resources. The configurable matrix unit supports mixed-precision operations and adapts to diverse compute demands and memory bandwidth constraints. An asynchronous matrix multiplication abstraction with flexible granularity conceals hardware details, simplifies matrix-vector overlap, and supports a unified software stack. The architecture is integrated into four open-source CPU RTL platforms and evaluated on representative AI models. Matrix unit utilization under GEMM workloads exceeds 90% across all platforms. When configured with compute throughput and memory bandwidth comparable to Intel AMX, our design achieves speedups of 1.57x, 1.57x, and 2.31x on ResNet, BERT, and Llama3, with over 30% of the gains attributed to overlapped matrix-vector execution. A 4 TOPS@2GHz matrix unit occupies only 0.53 mm\textsuperscript{2} in 14nm CMOS. These results demonstrate strong cross-platform adaptability and effective hardware-software co-optimization, offering a practical matrix extension for the open-source community.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

matrix extension
CPU architecture
design overhead
hardware-software co-design
AI workloads
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

matrix extension
asynchronous execution
configurable architecture
hardware-software co-optimization
open-source CPU
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Jinpeng Ye
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
C
Chongxi Wang
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
W
Wenqing Li
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Bin Yuan
Bin Yuan
China University of Petroleum (East China)
Hydraulic FracturingReservoir SimulationUnconventional ReservoirsEnhanced Oil Recovery
Shiyi Wang
Shiyi Wang
Imperial College London
deep learning
Fenglu Zhang
Fenglu Zhang
Tsinghua University
Internet MeasurementProtocol Analysis
J
Junyu Yue
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
J
Jianan Xie
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y
Yunhao Ye
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
H
Haoyu Deng
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y
Yingkun Zhou
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
X
Xin Cheng
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
F
Fuxin Zhang
State Key Lab of Processors, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Jian Wang
Jian Wang
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Bio-inspired roboticsIntelligent controlMechatronics