On the Use of Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Stochastic MKP under Dynamic Constraints

📅 2026-04-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

204K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the multi-knapsack problem (MKP) under stochastic and dynamic constraints, where item weights follow normal distributions and knapsack capacities evolve over time, subject to chance constraints defined at a specified confidence level. The problem is formulated for the first time as a bi-objective optimization model that balances expected profit maximization against the probabilistic satisfaction of capacity constraints. Through a systematic comparison of decomposition-based and dominance-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), integrated with tailored mechanisms for handling chance constraints and adapting to dynamic environments, the experiments reveal distinct performance characteristics across varying levels of uncertainty, confidence thresholds, and dynamic scenarios. These findings offer practical guidance and algorithmic insights for solving stochastic dynamic resource allocation problems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The multiple knapsack problem (MKP) generalizes the classical knapsack problem by assigning items to multiple knapsacks subject to capacity constraints. It is used to model many real-world resource allocation and scheduling problems. In practice, these optimization problems often involve stochastic and dynamic components. Evolutionary algorithms provide a flexible framework for addressing such problems under uncertainty and dynamic changes. In this paper, we investigate a stochastic and dynamic variant of MKP with chance constraints, where the item weights are modeled as independent normally distributed random variables and knapsack capacities change during the optimization process. We formulate the problem as a bi-objective optimization formulation that balances profit maximization and probabilistic capacity satisfaction at a given confidence level. We conduct an empirical comparison of four widely used multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), representing both decomposition- and dominance-based search paradigms. The algorithms are evaluated under varying uncertainty levels, confidence thresholds, and dynamic change settings. The results provide comparative insights into the behavior of decomposition-based and dominance-based MOEAs for stochastic MKP under dynamic constraints.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

stochastic MKP
dynamic constraints
chance constraints
bi-objective optimization
evolutionary algorithms
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

bi-objective optimization
stochastic MKP
dynamic constraints
chance constraints
multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
🔎 Similar Papers