🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the dual risks of over-reliance and under-reliance on AI tools—such as large language models—that can impair developers’ long-term capabilities and productivity. Through semi-structured interviews with 22 software developers and subsequent thematic analysis, the research introduces a novel AI dependency regulation framework centered on “control levels.” This framework systematically characterizes patterns of AI dependency, delineates two forms of dependency imbalance along with their associated risks, and operationalizes dependency intensity into distinct, actionable control levels. By doing so, it provides a theoretical foundation for fostering responsible and effective use of AI in software development and offers actionable insights for the design of future AI-assisted development tools and related policy formulation.
📝 Abstract
How software developers interact with Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered tools, including Large Language Models (LLMs), plays a vital role in how these AI-powered tools impact them. While overreliance on AI may lead to long-term negative consequences (e.g., atrophy of critical thinking skills); underreliance might deprive software developers of potential gains in productivity and quality. Based on twenty-two interviews with software developers on using LLMs for software development, we propose a preliminary reliance-control framework where the level of control can be used as a way to identify AI overreliance and underreliance. We also use it to recommend future research to further explore the different control levels supported by the current and emergent LLM-driven tools. Our paper contributes to the emerging discourse on AI overreliance and provides an understanding of the appropriate degree of reliance as essential to developers making the most of these powerful technologies. Our findings can help practitioners, educators, and policymakers promote responsible and effective use of AI tools.