🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of verifiability in summaries generated by large language models, which poses significant trustworthiness risks in compliance-sensitive domains such as government and legal applications. To mitigate this issue, the authors propose a 24-billion-parameter verifiable summarization model that, for the first time, enables fine-grained citation tracing in multilingual long-document summarization—each summary span is explicitly linked to its source sentence in the original text. The model is trained using chain-of-thought prompting, a multi-stage automatic verification mechanism, and a synthetic data pipeline, drawing from diverse multilingual sources including parliamentary proceedings, web pages, and Wikipedia across five languages. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially outperforms all open-source baselines, including models with three times its parameter count. Model weights and an interactive demo are publicly released.
📝 Abstract
Large language models frequently generate plausible but unfaithful summaries that users cannot verify against source text, a critical limitation in compliance-sensitive domains such as government and legal analysis. We present sui-1, a 24B parameter model that produces abstractive summaries with inline citations, enabling users to trace each claim to its source sentence. Our synthetic data pipeline combines chain-of-thought prompting with multi-stage verification, generating over 22,000 high-quality training examples across five languages from diverse sources including parliamentary documents, web text, and Wikipedia. Evaluation shows sui-1 significantly outperforms all tested open-weight baselines, including models with 3x more parameters. These results demonstrate that task-specific training substantially outperforms scale alone for citation-grounded summarization. Model weights and an interactive demo are publicly available.