Mining Q&A Platforms for Empirical Evidence on Quantum Software Programming

📅 2025-03-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Empirical research in quantum software engineering remains severely lacking, hindering the advancement of industrial-scale quantum programming practices. Method: This study conducts the first systematic empirical analysis of nearly 7,000 quantum programming–related Q&A posts across four Stack Exchange platforms, employing a mixed-method approach combining LDA topic modeling and manual coding, alongside cross-platform data crawling, cleaning, and structured analysis. Contribution/Results: We identify 20 core discussion topics—including foundational quantum physics, Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms, and object-oriented implementation challenges—as well as nine prevalent quantum SDKs (with Qiskit dominating). We propose a novel four-dimensional challenge taxonomy spanning theory, algorithms, experimentation, and education, bridging the theory–practice gap. Findings reveal developer priorities, technical difficulty gradients, and ecosystem evolution patterns, providing empirically grounded insights for quantum software engineering methodology, tool design, and pedagogical strategies.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The rise of quantum computing has driven the need for quantum software engineering, yet its programming landscape remains largely unexplored in empirical research. As quantum technologies advance toward industrial adoption, understanding programming aspects is crucial to addressing software development challenges. This study analyzes 6,935 quantum software programming discussion posts from Stack Exchange platforms (Quantum Computing, Stack Overflow, Software Engineering, and Code Review). Using topic modeling and qualitative analysis, we identified key discussion topics, trends (popular and difficult), tools/frameworks, and practitioner challenges. Twenty topics were identified, including popular ones such as physical theories and mathematical foundations, as well as security and encryption algorithms, while the most difficult were object-oriented programming and parameter control in quantum algorithms. Additionally, we identified nine frameworks that support quantum programming, with Qiskit emerging as the most widely adopted. Our findings also reveal core challenges in quantum software programming, thematically mapped into four areas: theories and mathematical concepts, algorithms and applications, experimental practices and software development, and education and community engagement. This study provides empirical insights that can inform future research, tool development, and educational efforts, supporting the evolution of the quantum software ecosystem.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explores quantum software programming challenges through empirical analysis.
Identifies key topics, trends, and tools in quantum programming discussions.
Highlights practitioner challenges and informs future quantum software development.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Topic modeling identifies quantum programming trends.
Qualitative analysis reveals key practitioner challenges.
Qiskit identified as most adopted quantum framework.
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Arif Ali Khan
Arif Ali Khan
Associate Professor (tenure track), M3S Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland
Quantum Software EngineeringGlobal Software DevelopmentSoftware Process Improvement
B
Boshuai Ye
M3S Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland
M
Muhammad Azeem Akbar
Software Engineering Department, LUT University, Finland
Javed Ali Khan
Javed Ali Khan
University of Hertforshire, UK
Software EngineeringCrowdRERepositories MiningAI4SEHealth Analytics
D
D. Mougouei
Deakin University, Australia
X
Xinyuan Ma
M3S Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland