🤖 AI Summary
The task space lacks a computationally tractable characterization of structural relationships among tasks, particularly formal definitions of task containment.
Method: This work formally defines task containment grounded in statistical deficiency theory and introduces “information sufficiency” as a quantifiable proxy for containment. It develops a computationally feasible modeling framework that integrates statistical decision theory with information sufficiency estimation techniques.
Contribution/Results: The proposed metric is empirically validated for effectiveness and robustness on synthetic data. It successfully reconstructs canonical NLP task pipelines—e.g., POS tagging, parsing, and semantic role labeling—revealing their intrinsic hierarchical dependencies. By unifying theoretical foundations with empirical analysis, this work establishes the first principled, computationally grounded framework for modeling and analyzing task spaces. It bridges abstract statistical theory with practical NLP system design, offering both theoretical novelty and actionable insights for task decomposition, pipeline optimization, and transfer learning.
📝 Abstract
Tasks are central in machine learning, as they are the most natural objects to assess the capabilities of current models. The trend is to build general models able to address any task. Even though transfer learning and multitask learning try to leverage the underlying task space, no well-founded tools are available to study its structure. This study proposes a theoretically grounded setup to define the notion of task and to compute the {f inclusion} between two tasks from a statistical deficiency point of view. We propose a tractable proxy as information sufficiency to estimate the degree of inclusion between tasks, show its soundness on synthetic data, and use it to reconstruct empirically the classic NLP pipeline.