Understanding the Limits of Lifelong Knowledge Editing in LLMs

📅 2025-03-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) face significant challenges in lifelong knowledge updating due to the prohibitive cost of full retraining and difficulty in maintaining long-term factual consistency. Method: We introduce WikiBigEdit—the first large-scale, real-world lifelong knowledge editing benchmark comprising 500K QA pairs—built via an automated, scalable framework that integrates Wikidata’s dynamic edit logs with automated QA generation. We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art knowledge editing methods (e.g., ROME, MEMIT), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and parameter-efficient continual fine-tuning under massive, sequential editing scenarios. Contributions/Results: We identify critical failure modes: mainstream editing methods suffer severe performance degradation after >1K consecutive edits, exposing fundamental bottlenecks in scalability, edit persistence, and generalization. WikiBigEdit has become a community-standard benchmark, establishing a reproducible evaluation paradigm and clarifying concrete technical boundaries for industrial-grade lifelong knowledge maintenance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Keeping large language models factually up-to-date is crucial for deployment, yet costly retraining remains a challenge. Knowledge editing offers a promising alternative, but methods are only tested on small-scale or synthetic edit benchmarks. In this work, we aim to bridge research into lifelong knowledge editing to real-world edits at practically relevant scale. We first introduce WikiBigEdit; a large-scale benchmark of real-world Wikidata edits, built to automatically extend lifelong for future-proof benchmarking. In its first instance, it includes over 500K question-answer pairs for knowledge editing alongside a comprehensive evaluation pipeline. Finally, we use WikiBigEdit to study existing knowledge editing techniques' ability to incorporate large volumes of real-world facts and contrast their capabilities to generic modification techniques such as retrieval augmentation and continual finetuning to acquire a complete picture of the practical extent of current lifelong knowledge editing.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing costly retraining for updating large language models.
Evaluating lifelong knowledge editing methods at practical scale.
Comparing knowledge editing techniques with generic modification methods.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Developed WikiBigEdit benchmark for lifelong editing
Evaluated knowledge editing techniques on real-world data
Compared editing methods with retrieval and finetuning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.