🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses a critical gap in the safety alignment of text-to-image (T2I) models, which predominantly target explicitly malicious content while overlooking compound semantic risks arising from implicit combinations of benign concepts. The work formally defines the “Multi-Concept Composition Un-safety” (MCCU) problem and introduces TwoHamsters, the first large-scale benchmark comprising 17.5k prompts, to systematically evaluate ten state-of-the-art T2I models and sixteen defense mechanisms. Experimental results reveal that the FLUX model achieves a generation success rate of 99.52% under MCCU conditions, whereas LLaVA-Guard—the current best defense—attains only a 41.06% recall rate, underscoring the severe inadequacy of existing safety paradigms in mitigating composite semantic threats.
📝 Abstract
Despite the remarkable synthesis capabilities of text-to-image (T2I) models, safeguarding them against content violations remains a persistent challenge. Existing safety alignments primarily focus on explicit malicious concepts, often overlooking the subtle yet critical risks of compositional semantics. To address this oversight, we identify and formalize a novel vulnerability: Multi-Concept Compositional Unsafety (MCCU), where unsafe semantics stem from the implicit associations of individually benign concepts. Based on this formulation, we introduce TwoHamsters, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 17.5k prompts curated to probe MCCU vulnerabilities. Through a rigorous evaluation of 10 state-of-the-art models and 16 defense mechanisms, our analysis yields 8 pivotal insights. In particular, we demonstrate that current T2I models and defense mechanisms face severe MCCU risks: on TwoHamsters, FLUX achieves an MCCU generation success rate of 99.52%, while LLaVA-Guard only attains a recall of 41.06%, highlighting a critical limitation of the current paradigm for managing hazardous compositional generation.