🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the vulnerability of multimodal large language models to endogenous reasoning drift during reinforcement fine-tuning, which induces unpredictable distributional shifts in autoregressive generation and compromises reasoning consistency and decision reliability. The study formalizes this issue as multimodal concept drift and introduces CPO++, a novel framework that integrates counterfactual reasoning with domain knowledge to enable autonomous optimization. By decoupling spurious correlations through controlled perception–reasoning perturbations and preference optimization, CPO++ achieves end-to-end adaptation in non-stationary environments. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed method substantially enhances reasoning coherence, decision accuracy, and robustness against interference in high-dynamic, safety-critical scenarios such as medical diagnosis and autonomous driving, while also exhibiting exceptional zero-shot cross-domain generalization performance.
📝 Abstract
Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) has established itself as a critical paradigm for the alignment of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with complex human values and domain-specific requirements. Nevertheless, current research primarily focuses on mitigating exogenous distribution shifts arising from data-centric factors, the non-stationarity inherent in the endogenous reasoning remains largely unexplored. In this work, a critical vulnerability is revealed within MLLMs: they are highly susceptible to endogenous reasoning drift, across both thinking and perception perspectives. It manifests as unpredictable distribution changes that emerge spontaneously during the autoregressive generation process, independent of external environmental perturbations. To adapt it, we first theoretically define endogenous reasoning drift within the RFT of MLLMs as the multi-modal concept drift. In this context, this paper proposes Counterfactual Preference Optimization ++ (CPO++), a comprehensive and autonomous framework adapted to the multi-modal concept drift. It integrates counterfactual reasoning with domain knowledge to execute controlled perturbations across thinking and perception, employing preference optimization to disentangle spurious correlations. Extensive empirical evaluations across two highly dynamic and safety-critical domains: medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. They demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior performance in reasoning coherence, decision-making precision, and inherent robustness against extreme interference. The methodology also exhibits exceptional zero-shot cross-domain generalization, providing a principled foundation for reliable multi-modal reasoning in safety-critical applications.