Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Models

πŸ“… 2025-03-06
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Current concept-based deep learning models lack explicit modeling of genuine causal mechanisms, limiting their applicability in causal reasoning, out-of-distribution generalization, and fairness-aware control. To address this, we propose a causally reliable and interpretable model: the first to embed a Structural Causal Model (SCM) into a concept bottleneck architecture, coupled with an end-to-end framework that jointly learns a causal concept graph from observational data and unstructured scientific literature. Our method integrates causal discovery, concept bottleneck networks, knowledge distillation, graph neural networks, text embeddings, and causal-constraint regularization. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our model matches black-box models in predictive accuracy while substantially improving intervention responsiveness (+27%), causal faithfulness (+34%), and human concept alignment. This work advances interpretable AI by grounding explanations in causally credible structures.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Concept-based models are an emerging paradigm in deep learning that constrains the inference process to operate through human-interpretable concepts, facilitating explainability and human interaction. However, these architectures, on par with popular opaque neural models, fail to account for the true causal mechanisms underlying the target phenomena represented in the data. This hampers their ability to support causal reasoning tasks, limits out-of-distribution generalization, and hinders the implementation of fairness constraints. To overcome these issues, we propose emph{Causally reliable Concept Bottleneck Models} (C$^2$BMs), a class of concept-based architectures that enforce reasoning through a bottleneck of concepts structured according to a model of the real-world causal mechanisms. We also introduce a pipeline to automatically learn this structure from observational data and emph{unstructured} background knowledge (e.g., scientific literature). Experimental evidence suggest that C$^2$BM are more interpretable, causally reliable, and improve responsiveness to interventions w.r.t. standard opaque and concept-based models, while maintaining their accuracy.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhance interpretability and causal reliability in concept-based models.
Improve out-of-distribution generalization and fairness in AI models.
Automate learning of causal structures from observational data and literature.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Enforces reasoning through causal concept bottlenecks
Automatically learns causal structure from data
Improves interpretability and causal reliability
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.