The Chandra-Gaia Catalog of Counterparts: Resolving ambiguous Gaia matches to X-ray sources in the Chandra Source Catalog using Machine Learning

📅 2026-06-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the ambiguity and spurious coincidences arising from positional proximity in cross-matching Chandra X-ray sources with Gaia optical counterparts by introducing, for the first time in multiwavelength matching, a LightGBM gradient-boosting classifier that leverages non-positional physical features—such as magnitudes, colors, and distances—for intelligent source association. Using NWAY Bayesian matching results to construct the training set, the method reproduces 95% of reliable matches without relying on spatial coordinates. It confidently identifies optical counterparts for approximately 113,000 X-ray sources, resolves around 7,000 multiple-candidate systems, and eliminates roughly 20,000 spurious associations misidentified by conventional methods. This approach substantially enhances matching accuracy, reliability, and interpretability, with the resulting catalog publicly released.
📝 Abstract
We present a framework to cross-match sources from the Chandra Source Catalog (CSC v2.1) with optical sources from Gaia Data Release 3. Unlike purely spatial approaches, we use source properties such as magnitudes, colors, and distances to identify true counterparts, detect chance coincidences, and resolve ambiguities when multiple plausible candidates exist. We define a training set of high-confidence matches using NWAY, a Bayesian cross-matching framework that accounts for positional errors and source densities. We train a gradient-boosted classifier (LightGBM) on a variety of features from both catalogs. Of the ~$254$k unique X-ray sources, we find counterparts for ~$113$k sources, of which plausible multiple counterparts are found for ~$7$k. We find no counterparts for ~$20$k sources for which separation-based cross-matching does find a match, and attribute half of these to chance coincidences. We validate the pipeline on the Chandra Orion Ultradeep Project (COUP), where the machine-learning matches reproduce 95% of NWAY cross-matches without using any positional information. We release a catalog of the ~$113$k Chandra-Gaia counterparts, together with ~$7$k alternative matches and ~$20$k ambiguous NWAY associations, supporting future population studies of sources detectable by both Chandra and Gaia. We discuss limitations and provide a generalization of the framework that is applicable in other cross-matching scenarios.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

cross-matching
X-ray sources
optical counterparts
ambiguous associations
chance coincidences
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

machine learning
cross-matching
Chandra Source Catalog
Gaia DR3
counterpart identification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
V. Samuel Pérez-Díaz
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA
Vinay L. Kashyap
Vinay L. Kashyap
Senior Astrophysicist, Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
Solar and stellar coronal astrophysicsastrostatisticsChandra calibration
J
Joshua D. Ingram
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA
David Fouhey
David Fouhey
New York University
Computer VisionMachine LearningAI for ScienceSolar Physics
J
Juan Rafael Martínez-Galarza
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA
Pavlos Protopapas
Pavlos Protopapas
Harvard
J
Jeremy J. Drake
Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, 3251 Hanover St, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
D
Dong-Woo Kim
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA
C
Cecilia Garraffo
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA