Visual-OPSD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Unified Multimodal Reasoning

📅 2026-06-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing unified multimodal models rely on generating “Visual Thoughts” (VTs) for spatial reasoning tasks, incurring substantial computational overhead with limited performance gains. This work proposes Visual-OPSD, a novel approach that leverages semantic information from VT generation trajectories—rather than rendered images—for cross-modal knowledge transfer. By employing a weight-sharing teacher–student architecture and trajectory-based, token-wise Jensen–Shannon divergence distillation, the method efficiently transfers multimodal reasoning capabilities from a teacher model to a text-only student model. Evaluated across nine benchmarks, Visual-OPSD achieves an average improvement of 3.40 percentage points, accelerates inference by 14.3×, and outperforms same-scale vision-language models by 63.83 percentage points on Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSP) tasks.
📝 Abstract
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) interleave generated ''visual thoughts'' (VTs) with text reasoning to improve spatial tasks. This incurs roughly an order-of-magnitude inference cost from multi-step diffusion. We find this cost yields limited direct benefit. On ThinkMorph, removing or noising VTs barely changes accuracy across nine benchmarks. Once rendered, attention concentrates on the VT regardless of content. Yet a KL diagnostic shows that conditioning on a privileged VT trace shifts the model's completion distribution. This suggests the generation pathway encodes useful reasoning beyond the rendered pixels. Motivated by this gap, we propose Visual On-Policy Self-Distillation(Visual-OPSD). Teacher and student share identical weights but differ in context: the teacher sees privileged VTs while the student sees only the question. Token-level JSD distillation on on-policy student trajectories transfers the teacher's reasoning to a text-only student. Across nine benchmarks, Visual-OPSD improves over its generative teacher by $+3.40$pp with $14.3\times$ speedup (10.0s vs. 142.8s per sample) and outperforms same-scale VLMs by $+63.83$pp on VSP. A Gaussian-noise control ($+0.40$pp vs. $+10.28$pp for real VTs) and $58.4\%$ closure of the KL gap confirm that gains come from the semantic content of the generation pathway.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

unified multimodal models
visual thoughts
inference efficiency
multimodal reasoning
reasoning distillation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

On-Policy Self-Distillation
Visual Thoughts
Multimodal Reasoning
Token-level Distillation
Unified Multimodal Models
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Pengyu Li
Xi'an Jiaotong University; MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering
Z
Zhitao Gao
Xi'an Jiaotong University; MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering
Lingling Zhang
Lingling Zhang
Assistant Professor, Xi'an Jiaotong University
Computer visionFew-shot learningZero-shot learning
M
Muye Huang
Xi'an Jiaotong University; MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering
Y
Yuanming Li
Sun Yat-sen University
Fangzhi Xu
Fangzhi Xu
Xi'an Jiaotong University | Nanyang Technological University
Large Language ModelsSelf-TrainingReasoningGUI Agents
J
Jun Liu
Xi'an Jiaotong University; MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University