SciRisk-Bench: A Risk-Dimension-Aware Benchmark for AI4Science Safety

📅 2026-06-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of systematic characterization of domain-specific risks in current AI4Science safety evaluations, which hinders precise identification of model vulnerabilities in high-stakes scientific tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose the first dual-perspective benchmark that jointly considers risk dimensions and scientific disciplines, explicitly defining ten categories of scientific risks across seven major fields and 31 subdomains. Leveraging expert annotations from multiple disciplines and a diverse set of scientific tasks, we construct a structured evaluation dataset enabling fine-grained, cross-model, and cross-dimensional safety assessment. Empirical results reveal critical safety shortcomings of both general-purpose and science-specialized large language models across various risk types and disciplines, providing actionable diagnostic insights for future safety alignment efforts.
📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in AI for Science (AI4Science) workflows, from scientific question answering and literature analysis to laboratory planning and autonomous discovery. This progress creates an urgent need for safety benchmarks that evaluate not only scientific competence, but also whether models recognize and avoid risks in high-stakes scientific contexts. Existing AI4Science safety datasets cover several disciplines and task formats, leaving the underlying risk dimensions underspecified. We introduce \textbf{SciRisk-Bench}, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI4Science safety from two complementary perspectives: explicit risk dimensions and scientific disciplines. SciRisk-Bench covers 7 disciplines, 31 subdisciplines and 10 risk dimensions. In the experimental section, we evaluate both mainstream LLMs and science-oriented LLMs across risk dimensions, disciplines, and sub-disciplines, enabling fine-grained diagnosis of where scientific models remain unsafe.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI4Science safety
risk dimensions
scientific disciplines
safety benchmark
large language models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

risk-dimension-aware
AI4Science safety
scientific benchmark
large language models
fine-grained safety evaluation
🔎 Similar Papers
L
Linghao Feng
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y
Yinqian Sun
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
D
Dongqi Liang
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
S
Sicheng Shen
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
C
Chenfei Yan
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Y
Yuxuan Peng
School of Humanities, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Y
Yilin Zhao
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
H
Haibo Tong
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
K
Kai Li
Beijing Institute of AI Safety and Governance (Beijing-AISI)
F
FeiFei Zhao
Brain-inspired Cognitive Intelligence Lab, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Yi Zeng
Yi Zeng
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Brain-inspired AIAI SafetyAI Ethics and Governance