Ranking Treatment Saturations under Clustered Network Interference

📅 2026-06-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the problem of ranking treatment saturation levels under clustered network interference to maximize welfare for a target population. The authors propose an Empirical Success (ES) ranking rule based on a two-stage randomized saturation experiment, which estimates welfare through pairwise comparisons of saturation levels. Innovatively integrating statistical decision theory with additively separable regret loss, the method relies solely on summary statistics of within-cluster network structures to derive a non-asymptotic upper bound on maximum regret and characterize a near-optimal first-stage saturation distribution. Theoretically, the ES rule is shown to be asymptotically optimal within the class of threshold-based rankings and effectively minimizes worst-case regret, offering a robust strategy for selecting saturation levels in practical settings.
📝 Abstract
In this paper, we study how to rank a finite set of treatment saturations for a target population with clustered network interference. We propose an empirical success (ES) ranking rule that, for each pair of saturations, selects the saturation level with the higher estimated welfare using data from a two-stage randomized saturation design. We adopt the statistical decision theory framework with additively separable regret loss to assess the performance of the ES ranking rule. We derive non-asymptotic upper bounds on the maximum regret of the ES ranking rule that depend on the within-cluster network only through a single combinatorial summary of its dependency structure. We exploit these bounds to characterize a quasi-optimal first-stage saturation distribution within the two-stage randomized saturation design. We further show that the ES ranking rule is asymptotically optimal among threshold ranking rules in the sense of minimizing an upper bound on the worst-case regret.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

treatment saturation
clustered network interference
ranking
welfare
randomized saturation design
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

clustered network interference
empirical success ranking
randomized saturation design
statistical decision theory
non-asymptotic regret bounds
🔎 Similar Papers