The Speculative Future of Conversational AI for Neurocognitive Disorder Screening: a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

πŸ“… 2026-04-10
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

198K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
Current screening methods for neurocognitive disorders lack scalability, while conversational AI faces persistent challenges in social acceptance, user engagement, and clinical facilitation. This study addresses these gaps by conducting interviews with 36 clinicians, at-risk individuals, and caregivers to systematically integrate multi-stakeholder perspectives on the perceptions, expectations, and tensions surrounding conversational AI–based screening. Through qualitative analysis and user journey mapping grounded in a human-centered design framework, the research reveals that deploying conversational AI in home and community settings can effectively reduce social stress during cognitive assessments. It further identifies a critical tension between users’ needs for empathetic support and the demand for clinical standardization. These findings offer innovative, practice-oriented guidance for the feasible implementation and system design of conversational AI in early neurocognitive disorder screening.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), such as Alzheimer's disease, are globally prevalent and require scalable screening methods for proactive management. Prior research has explored the potential of technologies like conversational AI (CAI) to administer NCD screening tests. However, challenges remain in designing CAI-based solutions that make routine NCD screening socially acceptable, engaging, and capable of encouraging early medical consultation. In this study, we conducted interviews with 36 participants, including clinicians, individuals at risk of NCDs, and their caregivers, to explore the speculative future of adopting CAI for NCD screening. Our findings reveal shared expectations, such as deploying CAI in home or community settings to reduce social stress. Nonetheless, conflicts emerged among stakeholders, for example, users'need for emotional support may conflict with clinicians'preference for CAI's professional and standardized administration. Then, we look into the user journey of NCD screening based on the current practice of manual screening and the expected CAI-supported screening. Finally, leveraging the human-centered approach, we provide actionable implications for future CAI design in NCD screening.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

conversational AI
neurocognitive disorder screening
social acceptability
early medical consultation
user engagement
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

conversational AI
neurocognitive disorder screening
multi-stakeholder perspective
human-centered design
speculative design
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers