SAGE: A Top-Down Bottom-Up Knowledge-Grounded User Simulator for Multi-turn AGent Evaluation

πŸ“… 2025-10-13
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Evaluating multi-turn interactive agents typically relies on human annotators, resulting in low efficiency and poor scalability; existing simulated user approaches lack domain adaptability and fail to replicate authentic user behavior. Method: This paper proposes a domain-knowledge-integrated user simulation framework that jointly models top-down business logic (e.g., user personas, goal constraints) and bottom-up empirical data (e.g., product catalogs, FAQs), enabling a knowledge-enhanced large language model–driven simulator with integrated business rule modeling, intent generation, and dialogue state tracking. Contribution/Results: Experiments demonstrate substantial improvements in dialogue authenticity and diversity. In defect detection tasks, the proposed simulator identifies 33% more agent errors than baseline methods, significantly enhancing the accuracy and controllability of automated evaluation.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Evaluating multi-turn interactive agents is challenging due to the need for human assessment. Evaluation with simulated users has been introduced as an alternative, however existing approaches typically model generic users and overlook the domain-specific principles required to capture realistic behavior. We propose SAGE, a novel user Simulation framework for multi-turn AGent Evaluation that integrates knowledge from business contexts. SAGE incorporates top-down knowledge rooted in business logic, such as ideal customer profiles, grounding user behavior in realistic customer personas. We further integrate bottom-up knowledge taken from business agent infrastructure (e.g., product catalogs, FAQs, and knowledge bases), allowing the simulator to generate interactions that reflect users' information needs and expectations in a company's target market. Through empirical evaluation, we find that this approach produces interactions that are more realistic and diverse, while also identifying up to 33% more agent errors, highlighting its effectiveness as an evaluation tool to support bug-finding and iterative agent improvement.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Simulating realistic user behavior for multi-turn agent evaluation
Integrating domain-specific knowledge from business contexts into simulations
Enhancing agent error detection through knowledge-grounded user interactions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates top-down business logic for user personas
Leverages bottom-up business infrastructure knowledge bases
Generates realistic diverse interactions to detect agent errors
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Ryan Shea
Ryan Shea
Simon Fraser University
Computer Science
Y
Yunan Lu
Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, Arklex.ai
L
Liang Qiu
Arklex.ai
Z
Zhou Yu
Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, Arklex.ai