🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the current practice, value proposition, and critical challenges of generative AI (GenAI) in software project management. Through qualitative content analysis of 47 industry gray literature sources—including blogs, reports, and case studies—we identify practitioners’ prevailing conceptualization of GenAI as an “intelligent collaborator” rather than a replacement, with primary applications in task automation, predictive analytics, communication enhancement, and agile support. We propose a novel “Responsible AI Application Framework” that delineates GenAI’s functional boundaries and maps its integration to PMI’s Talent Triangle competency evolution. Key concerns—such as hallucination, ethical and privacy risks, and affective limitations—are empirically substantiated. The findings yield actionable guidelines for AI adoption to improve project efficiency and success rates, while establishing a foundational empirical basis for future research on AI-enabled project management.
📝 Abstract
Software practitioners are discussing GenAI transformations in software project management openly and widely. To understand the state of affairs, we performed a grey literature review using 47 publicly available practitioner sources including blogs, articles, and industry reports. We found that software project managers primarily perceive GenAI as an "assistant", "copilot", or "friend" rather than as a "PM replacement", with support of GenAI in automating routine tasks, predictive analytics, communication and collaboration, and in agile practices leading to project success. Practitioners emphasize responsible GenAI usage given concerns such as hallucinations, ethics and privacy, and lack of emotional intelligence and human judgment. We present upskilling requirements for software project managers in the GenAI era mapped to the Project Management Institute's talent triangle. We share key recommendations for both practitioners and researchers.