Guiding Energy-Efficient Locomotion through Impact Mitigation Rewards

📅 2025-10-10
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing imitation learning approaches predominantly focus on explicit gait trajectories while neglecting passive dynamics—a key factor underlying energy efficiency in biological locomotion. Method: We propose a physics-aware learning framework for motion control. Specifically, we introduce the Impact Mitigation Factor (IMF) as a differentiable, physics-based reward term that explicitly encodes passive dynamics into reinforcement learning objectives. Integrating Adversarial Motion Priors (AMP) with the IMF-guided reward, our method jointly optimizes both explicit trajectory tracking and implicit energy-efficient mechanisms in an end-to-end manner within simulation. Contribution/Results: Experiments demonstrate substantial reductions in cost of transport (CoT) across diverse locomotion tasks—up to 32% improvement—thereby effectively bridging the modeling gap between motion imitation and energetic efficiency. To our knowledge, this is the first work to explicitly formulate passive dynamics as an optimizable component of the RL reward structure for learned locomotion control.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Animals achieve energy-efficient locomotion by their implicit passive dynamics, a marvel that has captivated roboticists for decades.Recently, methods incorporated Adversarial Motion Prior (AMP) and Reinforcement learning (RL) shows promising progress to replicate Animals'naturalistic motion. However, such imitation learning approaches predominantly capture explicit kinematic patterns, so-called gaits, while overlooking the implicit passive dynamics. This work bridges this gap by incorporating a reward term guided by Impact Mitigation Factor (IMF), a physics-informed metric that quantifies a robot's ability to passively mitigate impacts. By integrating IMF with AMP, our approach enables RL policies to learn both explicit motion trajectories from animal reference motion and the implicit passive dynamic. We demonstrate energy efficiency improvements of up to 32%, as measured by the Cost of Transport (CoT), across both AMP and handcrafted reward structure.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Bridging imitation learning gap for passive dynamics in locomotion
Quantifying robot impact mitigation using physics-informed metrics
Improving energy efficiency through combined AMP and IMF rewards
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Impact Mitigation Factor reward guides locomotion
Combines Adversarial Motion Prior with passive dynamics
Learns motion trajectories and implicit dynamics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Chenghao Wang
Chenghao Wang
Northeastern University
Robotics
A
Arjun Viswanathan
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
E
Eric Sihite
Department of Aerospace Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Alireza Ramezani
Alireza Ramezani
Associate Professor, ECE, Northeastern University
Bioinspired RoboticsLegged Locomotion