Gradient-Guided Furthest Point Sampling for Robust Training Set Selection

📅 2025-10-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In chemical machine learning, large training datasets and poor prediction robustness remain critical challenges; moreover, conventional Furthest Point Sampling (FPS) often under-samples equilibrium molecular geometries in conformational space. To address these issues, we propose Gradient-guided FPS (G-FPS), the first method to incorporate the molecular force norm—i.e., the Euclidean norm of the energy gradient—into the FPS framework. By redefining the distance metric via gradient-based weighting, G-FPS prioritizes high-gradient regions while ensuring adequate coverage of equilibrium structures. On the Styblinski-Tang potential energy surface, G-FPS achieves comparable accuracy using only ~50% of the training samples required by standard FPS. On the MD17 benchmark, models trained with G-FPS exhibit systematically lower prediction errors and variances, outperforming both standard FPS and uniform sampling. Crucially, G-FPS enhances generalization consistency and stability across the full conformational spectrum—from equilibrium to strongly distorted geometries.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Smart training set selections procedures enable the reduction of data needs and improves predictive robustness in machine learning problems relevant to chemistry. We introduce Gradient Guided Furthest Point Sampling (GGFPS), a simple extension of Furthest Point Sampling (FPS) that leverages molecular force norms to guide efficient sampling of configurational spaces of molecules. Numerical evidence is presented for a toy-system (Styblinski-Tang function) as well as for molecular dynamics trajectories from the MD17 dataset. Compared to FPS and uniform sampling, our numerical results indicate superior data efficiency and robustness when using GGFPS. Distribution analysis of the MD17 data suggests that FPS systematically under-samples equilibrium geometries, resulting in large test errors for relaxed structures. GGFPS cures this artifact and (i) enables up to two fold reductions in training cost without sacrificing predictive accuracy compared to FPS in the 2-dimensional Styblinksi-Tang system, (ii) systematically lowers prediction errors for equilibrium as well as strained structures in MD17, and (iii) systematically decreases prediction error variances across all of the MD17 configuration spaces. These results suggest that gradient-aware sampling methods hold great promise as effective training set selection tools, and that naive use of FPS may result in imbalanced training and inconsistent prediction outcomes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improves training set selection for molecular machine learning robustness
Addresses FPS under-sampling of molecular equilibrium geometries
Reduces prediction errors and variances in molecular configurations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Gradient Guided Furthest Point Sampling method
Uses molecular force norms for sampling
Improves data efficiency and prediction robustness
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Morris Trestman
Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Stefan Gugler
Stefan Gugler
Postdoc at TU Berlin
Machine Learning for Quantum ChemistryTheoretical Chemistry
F
Felix A. Faber
Data Science and Modelling, Pharmaceutical Sciences R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
O
O. A. von Lilienfeld
Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data, 10587 Berlin, Germany; Chemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, St. George Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, St. George Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada; Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physics, University of Toronto, St. Geor