Student Development Agent: Risk-free Simulation for Evaluating AIED Innovations

πŸ“… 2025-10-10
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Amid growing demands for proactive ethical and safety evaluation in AI in Education (AIED), this work addresses the challenge of predicting long-term impacts of educational interventions on students’ non-cognitive skills (e.g., motivation, self-regulation, social-emotional competencies) without real-world risks. We propose a large language model (LLM)-based student development agent framework that dynamically models heterogeneous student traits through role-based configuration, context-aware interaction, and multi-agent collaborative learning. Validated in the MAIC simulation environment, our agents generate developmental trajectories highly consistent with longitudinal empirical data (r > 0.85), outperforming baseline models significantly. This study constitutes the first systematic application of LLM-driven individualized development agents for pre-deployment validation in AIED, establishing a psychologically grounded, interpretable, and scalable virtual trial paradigm for educational AI.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
In the age of AI-powered educational (AIED) innovation, evaluating the developmental consequences of novel designs before they are exposed to students has become both essential and challenging. Since such interventions may carry irreversible effects, it is critical to anticipate not only potential benefits but also possible harms. This study proposes a student development agent framework based on large language models (LLMs), designed to simulate how students with diverse characteristics may evolve under different educational settings without administering them to real students. By validating the approach through a case study on a multi-agent learning environment (MAIC), we demonstrate that the agent's predictions align with real student outcomes in non-cognitive developments. The results suggest that LLM-based simulations hold promise for evaluating AIED innovations efficiently and ethically. Future directions include enhancing profile structures, incorporating fine-tuned or small task-specific models, validating effects of empirical findings, interpreting simulated data and optimizing evaluation methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Simulating student development to evaluate AIED innovations safely
Predicting educational impacts without exposing real students to risks
Validating LLM-based simulations against real student outcome data
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Simulates student development using large language models
Evaluates educational interventions without real students
Validates predictions through multi-agent learning case study
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Jianxiao Jiang
Jianxiao Jiang
Institute of Education, Tsinghua University
human-computer interactionAI in education
Y
Yu Zhang
School of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China