🤖 AI Summary
Rising political polarization in Indonesia has intensified online toxicity toward minority groups, yet existing NLP research lacks systematic investigation into the interplay among toxicity, political polarization, and demographic factors. Method: We introduce the first Indonesian multilabel dataset, jointly annotating texts for toxicity severity, political polarization stance, and annotator demographics (e.g., gender, education level), enabling the first unified modeling of these three dimensions. Our approach proposes a multitask learning framework integrating label-cooperative learning and demographic-aware representation, evaluated on BERT-base and LLM baselines. Contribution/Results: Incorporating polarization signals improves toxicity detection F1 by 4.2%; integrating demographic features boosts polarization classification accuracy by 7.8%. Empirical results demonstrate that multidimensional annotation significantly enhances model robustness and fairness, offering a novel paradigm for analyzing structural biases in digital public spheres.
📝 Abstract
Polarization is defined as divisive opinions held by two or more groups on substantive issues. As the world's third-largest democracy, Indonesia faces growing concerns about the interplay between political polarization and online toxicity, which is often directed at vulnerable minority groups. Despite the importance of this issue, previous NLP research has not fully explored the relationship between toxicity and polarization. To bridge this gap, we present a novel multi-label Indonesian dataset that incorporates toxicity, polarization, and annotator demographic information. Benchmarking this dataset using BERT-base models and large language models (LLMs) shows that polarization information enhances toxicity classification, and vice versa. Furthermore, providing demographic information significantly improves the performance of polarization classification.