PRESCRIBE: Predicting Single-Cell Responses with Bayesian Estimation

📅 2025-10-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Addressing the challenge of reliably predicting perturbation effects on unseen genes in single-cell perturbation prediction—and quantifying associated uncertainty—this paper introduces the Multivariate Variational Evidence Regression (MVER) framework. MVER is the first method to jointly model epistemic uncertainty (arising from lack of functional similarity among genes) and aleatoric uncertainty (stemming from data noise and batch-to-batch quality variation), leveraging a Bayesian neural network with evidence-based learning. It produces well-calibrated, multigene response predictions alongside high-fidelity confidence scores. Evaluated across multiple benchmark datasets, MVER achieves >3% average improvement in prediction accuracy over state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, it effectively identifies and filters low-confidence predictions, substantially enhancing model reliability and practical utility in real-world biological applications.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In single-cell perturbation prediction, a central task is to forecast the effects of perturbing a gene unseen in the training data. The efficacy of such predictions depends on two factors: (1) the similarity of the target gene to those covered in the training data, which informs model (epistemic) uncertainty, and (2) the quality of the corresponding training data, which reflects data (aleatoric) uncertainty. Both factors are critical for determining the reliability of a prediction, particularly as gene perturbation is an inherently stochastic biochemical process. In this paper, we propose PRESCRIBE (PREdicting Single-Cell Response wIth Bayesian Estimation), a multivariate deep evidential regression framework designed to measure both sources of uncertainty jointly. Our analysis demonstrates that PRESCRIBE effectively estimates a confidence score for each prediction, which strongly correlates with its empirical accuracy. This capability enables the filtering of untrustworthy results, and in our experiments, it achieves steady accuracy improvements of over 3% compared to comparable baselines.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Predicting effects of unseen gene perturbations in single cells
Jointly measuring epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in predictions
Estimating confidence scores to filter unreliable perturbation forecasts
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian deep evidential regression for uncertainty estimation
Jointly measures epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty sources
Provides confidence scores correlating with prediction accuracy
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Jiabei Cheng
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Changxi Chi
Changxi Chi
Westlake University; NUAA
Deep LearningGenerative Model
J
Jingbo Zhou
Westlake University
Hongyi Xin
Hongyi Xin
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
J
Jun Xia
AIMS Lab, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou); The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology