MRI-derived quantification of hepatic vessel-to-volume ratios in chronic liver disease using a deep learning approach

📅 2025-10-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Chronic liver disease (CLD) progression involves complex microvascular remodeling, yet noninvasive, quantitative imaging biomarkers reflecting vascular alterations across disease stages remain lacking. Method: We applied a 3D U-Net model to automatically segment hepatic vasculature from portal-venous-phase gadoxetic acid–enhanced 3-T MRI in 197 subjects, enabling precise quantification of hepatic vein volume ratio (HVVR), portal vein volume ratio (PVVR), and total vessel volume ratio (TVVR). Contribution/Results: HVVR exhibited a significant, stage-dependent decline across CLD progression and demonstrated strong correlations with established clinical markers—including FIB-4, ALBI, MELD-Na, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), splenic volume, and platelet count (all *P* < 0.001). HVVR effectively discriminated healthy controls from patients across all CLD stages (AUC = 0.89). In contrast, PVVR and TVVR showed weaker or nonsignificant associations. This study establishes HVVR as a novel, noninvasive, MRI-derived imaging biomarker for CLD, offering a robust, quantitative tool for risk stratification and longitudinal disease monitoring.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Background: We aimed to quantify hepatic vessel volumes across chronic liver disease stages and healthy controls using deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, and assess correlations with biomarkers for liver (dys)function and fibrosis/portal hypertension. Methods: We assessed retrospectively healthy controls, non-advanced and advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) patients using a 3D U-Net model for hepatic vessel segmentation on portal venous phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MRI. Total (TVVR), hepatic (HVVR), and intrahepatic portal vein-to-volume ratios (PVVR) were compared between groups and correlated with: albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score, and fibrosis/portal hypertension (Fibrosis-4 [FIB-4] score, liver stiffness measurement [LSM], hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG], platelet count [PLT], and spleen volume). Results: We included 197 subjects, aged 54.9 $pm$ 13.8 years (mean $pm$ standard deviation), 111 males (56.3%): 35 healthy controls, 44 non-ACLD, and 118 ACLD patients. TVVR and HVVR were highest in controls (3.9; 2.1), intermediate in non-ACLD (2.8; 1.7), and lowest in ACLD patients (2.3; 1.0) ($p leq 0.001$). PVVR was reduced in both non-ACLD and ACLD patients (both 1.2) compared to controls (1.7) ($p leq 0.001$), but showed no difference between CLD groups ($p = 0.999$). HVVR significantly correlated indirectly with FIB-4, ALBI, MELD-Na, LSM, and spleen volume ($ρ$ ranging from -0.27 to -0.40), and directly with PLT ($ρ= 0.36$). TVVR and PVVR showed similar but weaker correlations. Conclusions: Deep learning-based hepatic vessel volumetry demonstrated differences between healthy liver and chronic liver disease stages and shows correlations with established markers of disease severity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Quantifying hepatic vessel volumes across chronic liver disease stages
Assessing correlations between vessel ratios and liver dysfunction biomarkers
Differentiating healthy and diseased livers using deep learning MRI analysis
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deep learning 3D U-Net segments hepatic vessels
Quantifies vessel-to-volume ratios from MRI scans
Correlates volumetric measurements with clinical biomarkers
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Alexander Herold
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
D
Daniel Sobotka
Computational Imaging Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
L
Lucian Beer
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
N
Nina Bastati
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
S
Sarah Poetter-Lang
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
M
Michael Weber
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Thomas Reiberger
Thomas Reiberger
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
M
Mattias Mandorfer
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
G
Georg Semmler
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
B
Benedikt Simbrunner
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
B
Barbara D. Wichtmann
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
S
Sami A. Ba-Ssalamah
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Michael Trauner
Michael Trauner
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
A
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Georg Langs
Georg Langs
Medical University of Vienna, CIR Lab
Machine Learning in NeuroImagingFunctional Connectivity