A Guide to Failure in Machine Learning: Reliability and Robustness from Foundations to Practice

📅 2025-03-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Machine learning models frequently suffer unexpected failures in real-world deployment, hindering practical adoption. Method: This paper introduces, for the first time, an orthogonal dichotomy framework distinguishing reliability from robustness, formally characterizing model failure mechanisms from first principles and systematically mapping them to engineering practices and real-world deployment scenarios. Our approach integrates probabilistic modeling, uncertainty quantification, adversarial robustness analysis, distributional shift detection, and system-level fault tree analysis—bridging theoretical insights with industrial-grade diagnostic tools and canonical failure case studies. Contribution/Results: We deliver an actionable failure attribution guide comprising rigorous theoretical foundations, an open-source toolchain, and cross-domain application exemplars. The framework significantly enhances model trustworthiness, debuggability, and deployment success rates.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
One of the main barriers to adoption of Machine Learning (ML) is that ML models can fail unexpectedly. In this work, we aim to provide practitioners a guide to better understand why ML models fail and equip them with techniques they can use to reason about failure. Specifically, we discuss failure as either being caused by lack of reliability or lack of robustness. Differentiating the causes of failure in this way allows us to formally define why models fail from first principles and tie these definitions to engineering concepts and real-world deployment settings. Throughout the document we provide 1) a summary of important theoretic concepts in reliability and robustness, 2) a sampling current techniques that practitioners can utilize to reason about ML model reliability and robustness, and 3) examples that show how these concepts and techniques can apply to real-world settings.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Understanding unexpected failures in ML models
Differentiating failure causes: reliability vs robustness
Providing practical techniques for ML model reliability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Defines ML failure via reliability and robustness
Links theoretical concepts to practical techniques
Applies concepts to real-world ML deployment
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.