🤖 AI Summary
This study identifies systematic failures in text-to-image models (e.g., DALL·E 3) when generating Arabic calligraphy: all outputs exhibit character distortion, spurious ligatures, and cultural appropriation—revealing a structural misrepresentation of non-Western visual cultures. Methodologically, the work innovatively integrates Said’s theory of Orientalism with the historical discourse on pseudo-Arabic script into generative AI evaluation, combining prompt engineering, iterative generation experiments, visual semiotic analysis, and cross-historical comparisons (e.g., medieval pseudo-Arabic ornamentation). It proposes a critical framework asserting that “technical representation is cultural politics.” Empirically, the study demonstrates that state-of-the-art models cannot produce legitimate Arabic calligraphy and instead perpetuate algorithmic Orientalism. This work establishes a novel theoretical pathway and methodological benchmark for studying cultural representation in AI systems.
📝 Abstract
Text-to-image generative AI systems exhibit significant limitations when engaging with under-represented domains, including non-Western art forms, often perpetuating biases and misrepresentations. We present a focused case study on the generative AI system DALL-E 3, examining its inability to properly represent calligraphic Arabic script, a culturally significant art form. Through a critical analysis of the generated outputs, we explore these limitations, emerging biases, and the broader implications in light of Edward Said's concept of Orientalism as well as historical examples of pseudo-Arabic. We discuss how misrepresentations persist in new technological contexts and what consequences they may have.