Acyclic Graph Pattern Counting under Local Differential Privacy

📅 2026-03-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limited generality of existing local differential privacy (LDP) approaches, which support counting only specific acyclic graph patterns such as triangles or stars. The paper proposes the first general LDP framework for counting arbitrary acyclic subgraph patterns. By leveraging a multi-round recursive construction of subpatterns, randomized labeling, and a tailored communication protocol, the method effectively handles pattern generalization and node duplication in distributed graph data while providing rigorous theoretical error bounds. Empirical evaluations on real-world datasets demonstrate utility improvements of 46–2600× over baseline methods and a 300–650× reduction in communication overhead. For an acyclic pattern with $k$ edges, the framework achieves an additive error of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N} \cdot d(G)^k)$, where $d(G)$ denotes the maximum degree of the graph.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Graph pattern counting serves as a cornerstone of network analysis with extensive real-world applications. Its integration with local differential privacy (LDP) has gained growing attention for protecting sensitive graph information in decentralized settings. However, existing LDP frameworks are largely ad hoc, offering solutions only for specific patterns such as triangles and stars. A general mechanism for counting arbitrary graph patterns, even for the subclass of acyclic patterns, has remained an open problem. To fill this gap, we present the first general solution for counting arbitrary acyclic patterns under LDP. We identify and tackle two fundamental challenges: generalizing pattern construction from distributed data and eliminating node duplication during the construction. To address the first challenge, we propose an LDP-tailored recursive subpattern counting framework that incrementally builds patterns across multiple communication rounds. For the second challenge, we apply a random marking technique that restricts each node to a unique position in the pattern during computation. Our mechanism achieves strong utility guarantees: for any acyclic graph pattern with $k$ edges, we achieve an additive error of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}d(G)^k)$, where $N$ is the number of nodes and $d(G)$ is the maximum degree of the input graph $G$. Experiments on real-world graph datasets across multiple types of acyclic patterns demonstrate that our mechanisms achieve up to $46$-$2600\times$ improvement in utility and $300$-$650\times$ reduction in communication cost compared to the baseline methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

acyclic graph pattern counting
local differential privacy
graph analysis
privacy-preserving
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Local Differential Privacy
Acyclic Graph Pattern Counting
Recursive Subpattern Counting
Random Marking
Distributed Graph Analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yihua Hu
Yihua Hu
Reader (Associate Professor) of Electrical Engineering, King's College London
Electric vehicleRenewable Power GenerationMore electric ship/aircraftRobticsand NDT
K
Kuncan Wang
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
W
Wei Dong
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore