ProAI: Proactive Multi-Agent Conversational AI with Structured Knowledge Base for Psychiatric Diagnosis

📅 2025-02-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current conversational AI systems are predominantly reactive, limiting their applicability in clinical tasks requiring proactive guidance—such as psychiatric diagnosis. This paper proposes an active, multi-agent dialogue system tailored for psychiatric differential diagnosis, departing from conventional large language model (LLM) paradigms. Our approach introduces a memory-goal joint reasoning framework augmented by a structured knowledge graph, a diagnosis-driven dialogue orchestration mechanism, and a collaborative multi-agent clinical interview architecture. Additionally, we integrate clinical guideline-aligned prompt engineering to ensure domain fidelity. The system undergoes rigorous validation via simulated patient interactions, user experience evaluation, and expert blind review. In psychiatric differential diagnosis, it achieves 83.3% accuracy—significantly outperforming baseline models—while satisfying stringent requirements for clinical professionalism, logical coherence, and empathetic interaction.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Most LLM-driven conversational AI systems operate reactively, responding to user prompts without guiding the interaction. Most LLM-driven conversational AI systems operate reactively, responding to user prompts without guiding the interaction. However, many real-world applications-such as psychiatric diagnosis, consulting, and interviews-require AI to take a proactive role, asking the right questions and steering conversations toward specific objectives. Using mental health differential diagnosis as an application context, we introduce ProAI, a goal-oriented, proactive conversational AI framework. ProAI integrates structured knowledge-guided memory, multi-agent proactive reasoning, and a multi-faceted evaluation strategy, enabling LLMs to engage in clinician-style diagnostic reasoning rather than simple response generation. Through simulated patient interactions, user experience assessment, and professional clinical validation, we demonstrate that ProAI achieves up to 83.3% accuracy in mental disorder differential diagnosis while maintaining professional and empathetic interaction standards. These results highlight the potential for more reliable, adaptive, and goal-driven AI diagnostic assistants, advancing LLMs beyond reactive dialogue systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proactive AI for psychiatric diagnosis
Structured knowledge-guided memory integration
Multi-agent reasoning for clinician-style diagnostics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proactive conversational AI framework
Structured knowledge-guided memory integration
Multi-agent proactive reasoning system
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yuqi Wu
Yuqi Wu
PhD , University of Alberta, Fudan University
Natural Language ProcessingComputational PsychiatryLarge Language Models
Guangya Wan
Guangya Wan
University of Virginia
Deep LearningLarge Language Model
J
Jingjing Li
McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia
S
Shengming Zhao
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta
L
Lingfeng Ma
Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta
T
Tianyi Ye
Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta
I
Ion Pop
Academy for Engineering, Fudan University
Y
Yanbo Zhang
Academy for Engineering, Fudan University
J
Jie Chen
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta; Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta