🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates when triangle detection becomes easier in graphs that exclude a fixed graph pattern $H$, and examines whether the computational complexity remains equivalent across three settings: subgraph, induced subgraph, and colored-graph formulations. By constructing a graph transformation $H^+$ that preserves both triangle count and 3-colorability, and by introducing a novel color-coding-inspired self-reduction technique, the authors reduce triangle detection in induced and colored $H$-free graphs to the standard $H^+$-free graph setting. This establishes, for the first time, the equivalence of tractability among all three models, yielding a unified dichotomy framework that provides a theoretical foundation for understanding subgraph detection complexity under forbidden pattern constraints.
📝 Abstract
A recent paper by the authors (ITCS'26) initiates the study of the Triangle Detection problem in graphs avoiding a fixed pattern $H$ as a subgraph and proposes a \emph{dichotomy hypothesis} characterizing which patterns $H$ make the Triangle Detection problem easier in $H$-free graphs than in general graphs.
In this work, we demonstrate that this hypothesis is, in fact, equivalent to analogous hypotheses in two broader settings that a priori seem significantly more challenging: \emph{induced} $H$-free graphs and \emph{colored} $H$-free graphs.
Our main contribution is a reduction from the induced $H$-free case to the non-induced $\H^+$-free case, where $\H^+$ preserves the structural properties of $H$ that are relevant for the dichotomy, namely $3$-colorability and triangle count. A similar reduction is given for the colored case.
A key technical ingredient is a self-reduction to Unique Triangle Detection that preserves the induced $H$-freeness property, via a new color-coding-like reduction.