🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates whether step-level information density uniformity in large language model (LLM) reasoning trajectories serves as an effective predictor of reasoning quality, testing the Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis.
Method: We propose an entropy-based, layer-wise information density metric that jointly models local abruptness suppression and global distribution uniformity, yielding a differentiable, unsupervised UID scoring mechanism.
Contribution/Results: Experiments show that correct reasoning paths significantly avoid information density spikes, and UID strongly correlates with answer correctness. Our method achieves 10–32% relative accuracy gains across six major reasoning benchmarks and substantially outperforms baselines on AIME2025. This is the first systematic demonstration that information density uniformity constitutes a critical implicit indicator of LLM reasoning robustness—establishing a novel, annotation-free paradigm for reasoning quality assessment and trajectory selection.
📝 Abstract
The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis suggests that effective communication maintains a stable flow of information. In this work, we revisit this principle in the context of large language model (LLM) reasoning traces, asking whether step-level uniformity reflects reasoning quality. To this end, we propose an entropy-based stepwise information density metric and introduce two complementary measures of uniformity, local and global uniformity scores. Across the experiments on six different reasoning benchmarks, we find that step-level uniformity not only provides a strong theoretical lens but also yields practical performance benefits; for example, selecting reasoning traces with more uniform information density at the step-level improves accuracy by 10-32% relative gains over baselines at AIME2025. Our analysis further reveals that correct reasoning traces tend to avoid sharp information density spikes, while incorrect traces exhibit irregular information bursts. These results demonstrate that UID-inspired information density measures outperform alternative internal signals as predictors of reasoning quality. Results highlight the uniformity of the information density as a robust diagnostic and selection criterion for building more reliable and accurate reasoning systems.