🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of ensuring trustworthiness in out-of-distribution scenarios when performing counterfactual “What-If” analysis with digital twins for 6G networks in edge computing, where disjointed telemetry and validation pipelines hinder reliability. To overcome this limitation, the authors propose a data-driven digital twin framework that leverages cloud-edge协同 scalable telemetry aggregation and semantic alignment to enable performance extrapolation and validation under unseen conditions such as high load. The work introduces mechanism-aware feature engineering and devises a validation mechanism based on symbolic consistency and direction sensitivity, significantly enhancing model reliability in extrapolative settings. Evaluated on a Kubernetes cluster using unified modeling with DNN and XGBoost, the approach achieves regression accuracy with R² > 0.99 for both models, and XGBoost attains a direction accuracy (Sa) exceeding 0.90, effectively supporting proactive resource scaling decisions.
📝 Abstract
Network Digital Twins (NDTs) enable safe what-if analysis for 6G cloud-edge infrastructures, but adoption is often limited by fragmented workflows from telemetry to validation. We present a data-driven NDT framework that extends 6G-TWIN with a scalable pipeline for cloud-edge telemetry aggregation and semantic alignment into unified data models. Our contributions include: (i) scalable cloud-edge telemetry collection, (ii) regime-aware feature engineering capturing the network's scaling behavior, and (iii) a validation methodology based on Sign Agreement and Directional Sensitivity. Evaluated on a Kubernetes-managed cluster, the framework extrapolates performance to unseen high-load regimes. Results show both Deep Neural Network (DNN) and XGBoost achieve high regression accuracy (R2 > 0.99), while the XGBoost model delivers superior directional reliability (Sa > 0.90), making the NDT a trustworthy tool for proactive resource scaling in out-of-distribution scenarios.