🤖 AI Summary
Existing Omni-MLLMs suffer from perceptual fragility due to their static fusion architectures, often underperforming single-modality baselines in multimodal joint reasoning. This work proposes the Chain of Modality (CoM) framework, which for the first time enables dynamic switching of multimodal fusion topologies, adaptively selecting among parallel, sequential, or interleaved input structures based on task demands. CoM incorporates dual cognitive pathways—intuitive and deliberative decision-making—to better align model behavior with task requirements. Requiring either no training or only data-efficient supervised fine-tuning, the method leverages dynamic routing and attention topology modulation to consistently and significantly outperform existing static fusion approaches across multiple benchmarks.
📝 Abstract
Omni-modal Large Language Models (Omni-MLLMs) promise a unified integration of diverse sensory streams. However, recent evaluations reveal a critical performance paradox: unimodal baselines frequently outperform joint multimodal inference. We trace this perceptual fragility to the static fusion topologies universally employed by current models, identifying two structural pathologies: positional bias in sequential inputs and alignment traps in interleaved formats, which systematically distort attention regardless of task semantics. To resolve this functional rigidity, we propose Chain of Modality (CoM), an agentic framework that transitions multimodal fusion from passive concatenation to dynamic orchestration. CoM adaptively orchestrates input topologies, switching among parallel, sequential, and interleaved pathways to neutralize structural biases. Furthermore, CoM bifurcates cognitive execution into two task-aligned pathways: a streamlined ``Direct-Decide'' path for direct perception and a structured ``Reason-Decide'' path for analytical auditing. Operating in either a training-free or a data-efficient SFT setting, CoM achieves robust and consistent generalization across diverse benchmarks.