Robust Optimal Experimental Design Accounting for Sensor Failure

πŸ“… 2026-04-15
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

231K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of sensor failure under high mechanical accelerations in structural dynamics experiments and the consequent degradation of traditional optimal experimental design (OED) performance. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose a robust OED framework that directly yields discrete sensor configurations. The approach integrates a relaxation strategy with gradient-based optimization and incorporates a binary-inducing regularizer to circumvent post-processing rounding heuristics. Leveraging a finite element model, the method is evaluated using the log-determinant of the parameter covariance matrix and mean squared error as performance metrics. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms classical designs across various sensor failure scenarios and efficiently handles high-dimensional, computationally expensive sensor placement problems.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Optimal experimental design provides a way of determining a-priori the best locations at which to place accelerometers in vibrations analysis experiments. However, in practice, sensors often fail during experimentation due high mechanical accelerations. There have been limited works exploring the use of robust OED in the context of vibrations analysis, where design spaces (i.e. candidate sensor locations and orientations) are high-dimensional and the finite-element models are expensive to compute. Therefore, this work considers the application of more general robust OED formulations to such a structural dynamics problem. We employ a relaxation-based approach that enables the use of efficient gradient-based optimization. Furthermore, we leverage a binary-inducing penalty during optimization to provide a binary sensor design as an alternative to leveraging post-optimization rounding heuristics. We consider performance metrics based on the log-determinant of the parameter covariance as well those based on parameter and prediction mean-squared errors. We find that although robust and classical designs are similar for the structural dynamics problem of interest, robust designs outperform classical designs on average over relevant failure scenarios of interest.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

robust optimal experimental design
sensor failure
vibrations analysis
structural dynamics
accelerometer placement
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

robust optimal experimental design
sensor failure
gradient-based optimization
binary-inducing penalty
structural dynamics
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.