Fast Debiasing of the LASSO Estimator

📅 2025-02-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the inherent bias of LASSO estimators in high-dimensional sparse regression and the high computational cost of conventional debiasing methods—which require iterative approximation of the inverse matrix—this paper proposes a novel paradigm: directly parameterizing the debiasing matrix $W = AM^ op$ and solving it in closed form. Under the mild condition that rows of the design matrix are approximately uncorrelated, we derive a unique, computationally efficient analytical solution, eliminating costly iterative optimization. The proposed method rigorously preserves the statistical guarantees of debiased LASSO, including $sqrt{n}$-consistency and asymptotic normality. Its theoretical time complexity is reduced from $O(nplog(1/varepsilon))$ for iterative approaches to $O(np)$. Numerical experiments confirm its effectiveness in bias correction and accurate coverage of confidence intervals.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In high-dimensional sparse regression, the extsc{Lasso} estimator offers excellent theoretical guarantees but is well-known to produce biased estimates. To address this, cite{Javanmard2014} introduced a method to ``debias"the extsc{Lasso} estimates for a random sub-Gaussian sensing matrix $oldsymbol{A}$. Their approach relies on computing an ``approximate inverse"$oldsymbol{M}$ of the matrix $oldsymbol{A}^ op oldsymbol{A}/n$ by solving a convex optimization problem. This matrix $oldsymbol{M}$ plays a critical role in mitigating bias and allowing for construction of confidence intervals using the debiased extsc{Lasso} estimates. However the computation of $oldsymbol{M}$ is expensive in practice as it requires iterative optimization. In the presented work, we re-parameterize the optimization problem to compute a ``debiasing matrix"$oldsymbol{W} := oldsymbol{AM}^{ op}$ directly, rather than the approximate inverse $oldsymbol{M}$. This reformulation retains the theoretical guarantees of the debiased extsc{Lasso} estimates, as they depend on the emph{product} $oldsymbol{AM}^{ op}$ rather than on $oldsymbol{M}$ alone. Notably, we provide a simple, computationally efficient, closed-form solution for $oldsymbol{W}$ under similar conditions for the sensing matrix $oldsymbol{A}$ used in the original debiasing formulation, with an additional condition that the elements of every row of $oldsymbol{A}$ have uncorrelated entries. Also, the optimization problem based on $oldsymbol{W}$ guarantees a unique optimal solution, unlike the original formulation based on $oldsymbol{M}$. We verify our main result with numerical simulations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Debiasing LASSO estimator in high-dimensional regression
Computing debiasing matrix directly for efficiency
Ensuring unique optimal solution in optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reparameterizes optimization for debiasing
Provides closed-form solution efficiently
Ensures unique optimal solution directly
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Shuvayan Banerjee
Department of Mathematics, IIT Bombay, and IIT Bombay Monash Research Academy
James Saunderson
James Saunderson
Monash University
Optimizationconvex optimizationsemidefinite programming
R
Radhendushka Srivastava
Department of Mathematics, IIT Bombay
Ajit Rajwade
Ajit Rajwade
Professor, Department of CSE, IIT Bombay
Image ProcessingComputer VisionCompressed SensingTomographic ReconstructionInverse Problems