🤖 AI Summary
In distributed multi-agent systems, correctness is often entangled with operational policies—such as scheduling and batching—making policy evolution prone to violating integrity guarantees. Method: This paper introduces Deterministic Causal Structure (DCS), the first formal framework that decouples correctness from execution policies, establishing a policy-agnostic foundation for correctness. Guided by the asynchronous computation boundary principle, DCS identifies the semilattice structure as a necessary condition for determinism and establishes “correctness-as-infrastructure” as a new paradigm. Contribution/Results: Based on a minimal axiomatized theory, integrating causal modeling and observational equivalence analysis, we rigorously prove four core properties: existence and uniqueness, policy-agnostic invariance, observational equivalence, and axiom minimality. DCS resolves causal ambiguity—unaddressed by existing models such as CRDTs—and enables modular, safe, and evolvable system construction.
📝 Abstract
In distributed multi-agent systems, correctness is often entangled with operational policies such as scheduling, batching, or routing, which makes systems brittle since performance-driven policy evolution may break integrity guarantees. This paper introduces the Deterministic Causal Structure (DCS), a formal foundation that decouples correctness from policy. We develop a minimal axiomatic theory and prove four results: existence and uniqueness, policy-agnostic invariance, observational equivalence, and axiom minimality. These results show that DCS resolves causal ambiguities that value-centric convergence models such as CRDTs cannot address, and that removing any axiom collapses determinism into ambiguity. DCS thus emerges as a boundary principle of asynchronous computation, analogous to CAP and FLP: correctness is preserved only within the expressive power of a join-semilattice. All guarantees are established by axioms and proofs, with only minimal illustrative constructions included to aid intuition. This work establishes correctness as a fixed, policy-agnostic substrate, a Correctness-as-a-Chassis paradigm, on which distributed intelligent systems can be built modularly, safely, and evolvably.