🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the iterative closure properties of graph-structured sets under the non-aggregative combinatorial operation of *fusion*, addressing two central problems: (1) deciding whether the fusion closure of a given set of graphs of bounded treewidth remains treewidth-bounded; and (2) if so, whether the closure can be exactly characterized by a constructible hyperedge replacement (HR) grammar. We establish that both problems are decidable: first, the treewidth-boundedness of the fusion closure is algorithmically testable; second, whenever the closure has bounded treewidth, there exists an effectively constructible HR grammar generating it. Our approach integrates HR grammars, monadic second-order logic modeling, and operations of constant renaming and forgetting to verify structural properties and synthesize grammars. The results provide a theoretical foundation and algorithmic framework for logical satisfiability checking over bounded-treewidth non-aggregative structured sets.
📝 Abstract
An aggregative composition is a binary operation obeying the
principle that the whole is determined by the sum of its parts. The
development of graph algebras, on which the theory of formal graph
languages is built, relies on aggregative compositions that behave
like disjoint union, except for a set of well-marked interface
vertices from both sides, that are joined. The same style of
composition has been considered in the context of relational
structures, that generalize graphs and use constant symbols to label
the interface.
In this paper, we study a non-aggregative composition operation,
called emph{fusion}, that joins non-deterministically chosen
elements from disjoint structures. The sets of structures obtained
by iteratively applying fusion do not always have bounded
tree-width, even when starting from a tree-width bounded set.
First, we prove that the problem of the existence of a bound on the
tree-width of the closure of a given set under fusion is decidable,
when the input set is described inductively by a finite
emph{hyperedge-replacement} (HR) grammar, written using the
operations of aggregative composition, forgetting and renaming of
constants. Such sets are usually called emph{context-free}.
Second, assuming that the closure under fusion of a context-free set
has bounded tree-width, we show that it is the language of an
effectively constructible HR grammar. A possible application of the
latter result is the possiblity of checking whether all structures
from a non-aggregatively closed set having bounded tree-width
satisfy a given monadic second order logic formula.