π€ AI Summary
This study investigates strategic voluntary disclosure behavior among multiple senders when disclosure or concealment entails costs, and examines its implications for decision-makers. Within a game-theoretic and information economics framework, the authors develop a model of strategic interaction among senders under asymmetric information. The analysis reveals that disclosure costs and concealment costs exert opposing effects on information revelation: the former induces strategic substitutability, suppressing disclosure, while the latter generates strategic complementarity, encouraging it. Moreover, increasing the number of senders does not necessarily enhance the decision-makerβs welfare and may even be detrimental. This finding challenges the intuitive notion that more information sources are inherently better, underscoring the critical role of cost structures in information aggregation.
π Abstract
We study voluntary disclosure with multiple biased senders who may bear costs for disclosing or concealing their private information. Under relevant assumptions, disclosures are strategic substitutes under a disclosure cost but complements under a concealment cost. Additional senders thus impede any sender's disclosure under a disclosure cost but promote it under a concealment cost. In the former case, a decision maker can be harmed by additional senders, even when senders have opposing interests. The effects under both kinds of message costs turn on how a sender, when concealing his information, expects others'messages to systematically sway the decision maker's belief.