🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates whether workers in emerging economies exposed to automation can realistically transition to safer occupations and identifies structural barriers to such mobility. Leveraging a knowledge graph encompassing nearly 10,000 Egyptian occupations, 20,000 skill activities, and over 80,000 occupation–skill relationships, the research quantifies the proportion of workers in high-automation-risk occupations who possess viable transition pathways—defined as sharing at least three skills with a target occupation and achieving a skill transferability rate of at least 50%. The analysis reveals that 20.9% of occupations face high automation risk, yet only 24.4% of affected workers have feasible transition paths. Among the 4,534 viable pathways identified, 15.6% involve process-oriented skills, underscoring their potential as a critical intervention lever. These findings highlight the necessity of proactively constructing occupational transition channels rather than relying on passive skill matching.
📝 Abstract
How many workers displaced by automation can realistically transition to safer jobs? We answer this using a validated knowledge graph of 9,978 Egyptian job postings, 19,766 skill activities, and 84,346 job-skill relationships (0.74% error rate). While 20.9% of jobs face high automation risk, we find that only 24.4% of at-risk workers have viable transition pathways--defined by $\geq$3 shared skills and $\geq$50% skill transfer. The remaining 75.6% face a structural mobility barrier requiring comprehensive reskilling, not incremental upskilling. Among 4,534 feasible transitions, process-oriented skills emerge as the highest-leverage intervention, appearing in 15.6% of pathways. These findings challenge optimistic narratives of seamless workforce adaptation and demonstrate that emerging economies require active pathway creation, not passive skill matching.