π€ AI Summary
This work investigates the limits of provability within the intuitionistic bounded arithmetic system $mathsf{IS}^1_2$ regarding circuit complexity lower bounds for SAT. Specifically, it addresses the question of whether $mathsf{IS}^1_2$ can prove that SAT lies outside co-nondeterministic circuits of fixed polynomial size. Technically, the paper introduces and analyzes a novel βrefuterβ model, which captures the fundamental obstacle to efficiently constructing infinitely-often $mathsf{coNP/poly}$ lower bounds in this system. The main result establishes, unconditionally, the existence of a constant $k$ such that $mathsf{IS}^1_2$ proves neither $mathrm{SAT}
otin mathsf{coNSIZE}[n^k]$ nor $mathsf{NP} subseteq mathsf{coNSIZE}[n^k]$. This constitutes the first unconditional unprovability result for polynomial-size circuit lower bounds in bounded arithmetic. The work thus unifies and deepens the interplay among bounded arithmetic, propositional proof complexity, and circuit lower bound theory.
π Abstract
We show that there is a constant $k$ such that Buss's intuitionistic theory $mathsf{IS}^1_2$ does not prove that SAT requires co-nondeterministic circuits of size at least $n^k$. To our knowledge, this is the first unconditional unprovability result in bounded arithmetic in the context of worst-case fixed-polynomial size circuit lower bounds. We complement this result by showing that the upper bound $mathsf{NP} subseteq mathsf{coNSIZE}[n^k]$ is unprovable in $mathsf{IS}^1_2$. In order to establish our main result, we obtain new unconditional lower bounds against refuters that might be of independent interest. In particular, we show that there is no efficient refuter for the lower bound $mathsf{NP}
subseteq mathsf{i.o} ext{-}mathsf{coNP}/mathsf{poly}$, addressing in part a question raised by Atserias (2006).