Beyond Adam: SOAP and Muon for Faster, Label-Efficient Training of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

📅 2026-07-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the long-standing reliance on Adam-family optimizers in training machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs), which has constrained improvements in both convergence speed and accuracy. For the first time, we introduce matrix-structured optimizers—SOAP, Muon, and their hybrid SOAP-Muon—into the training of NequIP and Allegro models, systematically investigating their impact on MLIP performance, particularly under partial force supervision and limited labeled data. Our experiments demonstrate that SOAP and SOAP-Muon significantly outperform Adam, achieving notable gains in both convergence rate and final prediction accuracy. These findings reveal optimizer selection as a critical yet overlooked design dimension for enhancing the efficiency and precision of MLIPs.
📝 Abstract
Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become a hallmark of AI for scientific simulation. While efforts on new architectures and datasets have led to increasingly accurate and general models, the choice of optimizer for training has largely remained unexplored, defaulting to Adam and its variants in the community. Here, we implement and systematically compare a class of recently proposed matrix-structured optimizers, including Muon, SOAP, and the hybrid SOAP-Muon, for training NequIP and Allegro MLIP models. We find that these optimizers can substantially outperform Adam in both convergence speed and final accuracy. SOAP and SOAP-Muon emerge as robust and consistently strong methods, while Muon only provides partial gains relative to Adam. The improvements are particularly pronounced under partial force supervision. Our results indicate that optimizer choice is an overlooked yet impactful design axis for MLIPs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

machine learning interatomic potentials
optimizer
training efficiency
label efficiency
convergence speed
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

matrix-structured optimizers
SOAP
Muon
label-efficient training
machine learning interatomic potentials
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
G
Gil Harari
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Y
Yoel Zimmermann
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
O
Ola Tangen Kulseng
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
L
Laura Zichi
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Chuin Wei Tan
Chuin Wei Tan
Harvard University
condensed matter physicsdensity functional theory
M
Marc L. Descoteaux
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Boris Kozinsky
Boris Kozinsky
Harvard University, Bosch Research
Computational materials sciencebatteriesthermoelectricscatalysismachine learning